The Antecedents of Trust in the Coretax Administration System and Its Relationship with Tax Compliance Behaviour: Evidence from Indonesia

  • Ali Reza Ahmadi Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia
  • Verni Juita Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia
Keywords: Coretax Administration System; Digital Tax Platform Trust; Tax Compliance Behaviour; Digital Literacy; Information Security and Privacy.

Abstract

The digital transformation of tax administration has increased taxpayers’ reliance on digital platforms, making trust an important factor in encouraging tax compliance. Addressing this issue, the present study investigates the effects of perceived system quality, institutional trust, digital literacy, and perceived information security and privacy on trust in Indonesia’s Coretax Administration System and tax compliance behaviour. Using a quantitative cross-sectional design, 708 responses were collected through an online survey, of which 586 valid responses were retained after data screening. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that perceived system quality, institutional trust, digital literacy, and perceived information security and privacy have significant positive effects on trust in the Coretax platform. Trust in the platform also has a significant positive effect on tax compliance behaviour, while all four antecedent variables have significant indirect effects on tax compliance through platform trust. These findings extend the Slippery Slope Framework to digital tax administration and highlight the importance of system reliability, institutional credibility, taxpayers’ digital capabilities, and information protection in strengthening trust and supporting voluntary tax compliance.

References

Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26(1), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.06.004

Audia, P. S., Tjaraka, H., & Utama, A. A. G. S. (2026). Digital tax compliance: The role of literacy, ease, and trust. Advances in Taxation Research, 4(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.60079/atr.v4i2.850

Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002

Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Duan, Y., & Dong, X. (2025). Does digital literacy matter for e-government usage behavior? An empirical analysis based on data from rural women in China. SAGE Open, 15(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251376118

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax authorities’ interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust. New Ideas in Psychology, 37, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.12.001

Gupta, P., Hooda, A., Jeyaraj, A., Seddon, J. J. M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2025). Trust, risk, privacy and security in e-government use: Insights from a MASEM analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 27, 1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10497-8

Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Clarifying the role of e-government trust in e-government success models: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 27. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v27i0.4079

Huang, C.-C., Wang, Y.-M., Wu, T.-W., & Wang, P.-A. (2013). An empirical analysis of the antecedents and performance consequences of using the Moodle platform. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(2), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.267

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The ‘slippery slope’ framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

Lee-Geiller, S. (2024). The moderating effect of digital literacy on the link between e-government effectiveness and trust in government. Journal of Policy Studies, 39(4), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.52372/jps.e672

Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792

McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Nulhusna, R., Sandhyaduhita, P. I., Hidayanto, A. N., & Phusavat, K. (2017). The relation of e-government quality on public trust and its impact on public participation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(3), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2017-0004

OECD. (2017). OECD guidelines on measuring trust. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264278219-en

OECD. (2022). Tax administration 2022: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1e797131-en

Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275

Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15

van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959

Published
2026-08-26