Pendekatan Systematic Literature Review: Faktor-faktor Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern
Abstract
An external auditor must examine the company's performance as reported in the financial accounts, particularly if it is a publicly traded corporation. To indicate and illustrate the company's capacity to sustain business continuity, auditors can provide a going concern audit opinion, which stakeholders can use as information when making decisions. The Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach is used in this study. The two primary sources of current research literature that may be used to categorize the factors that impact the acceptability of going concern audit opinions are internal and external considerations. Internal elements that measure the financial performance produced by the organization as a result of management performance include governance, real activity manipulation (RAM), and financial measurements like profitability, liquidity, leverage, or solvency. External variables include the reputation and quality of the auditor, opinion shooping, and financial circumstances that result in financial difficulties brought on by difficult or natural forces like the COVID-19 pandemic.
References
Anggraini, Y., Mulatsih, E. S., & Rosalin, F. (2021). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Likuiditas, Solvabilitas Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Opini Audit Going concern Pada Perusahaan Perdagangan Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jembatan (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis, Auditing, Dan Akuntansi), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.54077/jembatan.v6i1.57
Fahmi, I. (2017). Analysis of financial statements. Bandung Alfabetha.
Febriati, E., & Achmad, K. (2023). Pengaruh Kondisi Keuangan Terhadap Pemberian Opini Audit Going Concern Dengan Auditor Bereputasi Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Sektor Infrastruktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2020-2022). Reviu Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Sistem Informasi, 3(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.21776/reaksi.2024.3.1.244
Foster, B. P., & Shastri, T. (2016). Determinants of going concern opinions and audit fees for development stage enterprises. Advances in Accounting, 33, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.05.001
Fungki, D., Kuntadi, C., & Pramukty, R. (2023). Pengaruh Return Saham, Tata Kelola Perusahaan, Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Opini Audit Going concern Pada Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2019-2021. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(8), 3094–3107. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v2i8.1342
Jannah, S. G., & Machdar, N. M. (2023). Pengaruh Financial Distress, Audit Tenure, dan Profitabilitas terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going concern dengan Persistensi Laba sebagai Variabel Moderasi. CEMERLANG : Jurnal Manajemen dan Ekonomi Bisnis, 4(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.55606/cemerlang.v4i1.2262
Kim, M. (Hyo J. (2021). Effects of managerial overconfidence and ability on going-concern decisions and auditor turnover. Advances in Accounting, 54, 100549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2021.100549
Kalalinggi, S. Y. 2024. Studi literatur dan state of the art. In Suhardi (Ed.) Metodologi penelitian. (1st ed., pp. 74-89). CV. Gita Lentera. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377847335_METODOLOGI_PENELITIAN
Li, X., & Xin, Q. (2023). Employee Firing Costs And Auditors’ Going-Concern Opinions: Evidence From Wrongful Discharge Laws. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 42(3), 107070.
Muchayatin, M., & Lupita, H. E. (2022). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Menentukan Penerbitan Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Teknologi Keuangan, 1(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.56854/atk.v1i1.55
Mukti, C. F. C., Maharani, D. A., & Kustiwi, I. A. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas Dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going concern Pada Perusahaan Sektor Pariwisata, Restoran, Dan Hotel Tahun 2020-2022. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Manajemen dan Akuntansi (JEBISMA), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.70197/jebisma.v1i2.15
Nathasia, S., & Iskak, J. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Auditor, ROA, DER Terhadap Opini Audit Going concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Client Kantor Akuntan Publik XXX. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 2(3), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.61597/jbe-ogzrp.v2i3.50
Putri, N. A., & Hariani, S. (2024). Determinan Opini Audit Going Concern: Ukuran Perusahaan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Menggunakan Logistics Regression Analysis. JURNAL ECONOMINA, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v3i1.1118
Putri, S., & Lastanti, H. S. (2023). Pengaruh Financial Distress Dan Real Activity Manipulation Terhadap Pemberian Opini Audit Going concern Dengan Profitabilitas Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 3(1), 1989–1998. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v3i1.16478
Ramadhani, D. L. (2023). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Profitabilitas, Solvabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Kualitas Audit Terhadap Opini Audit Going concern (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Sektor Energi yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2017 – 2021). Jurnal Relevansi : Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Bisnis, 7(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.61401/relevansi.v7i2.107
Read, W. J., & Yezegel, A. (2018). Going-concern opinion decisions on bankrupt clients: Evidence of long-lasting auditor conservatism? Advances in Accounting, 40, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.12.004
Rochadi, I. & Deliza Henny. (2023). Pengaruh Ukuran Kap (Kantor Akuntan Publik), Profitabilitas, Dan Audit Delay Terhadap Opini Audit Going concern Dengan Kondisi Keuangan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 3(2), 3533–3546. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v3i2.18050
Samaah, H. F., & Laela, S. F. (2022). Kesulitan Keuangan Dan Opini Audit Going concern: Peran Moderasi Tata Kelola Perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 6(3), 804–828. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v6i3.2385
Snyder, H., (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, pp.333-339.
Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
Geiger, M. A., Basioudis, I. G., & DeLange, P. (2022). The effect of non-audit fees and industry specialization on the prevalence and accuracy of auditor’s going-concern reporting decisions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 47, 100473.
Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2011). PSA No. 30 SA Seksi 341. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik, 30, 2.
https://www.idnfinancials.com/iikp/pt-inti-agri-resources-tbk
https://www.idx.co.id/id (Bursa Efek Indonesia)
Xu, H., Dao, M., & Wu, J. (2018). The effect of real activities manipulation on going concern audit opinions for financially distressed companies. Review of Accounting and Finance, 17(4), 514–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-09-2016-0135
Hardi, H., Wiguna, M., Hariyani, E., & Putra, A.A. (2020). Opinion shooping, Prior Opinion, Audit Quality, Financial Condition, and Going concern Opinion. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7, 169-176.
Ginting, W. A. (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Opini Audit Going concern. Jurnal Rekayasa Keuangan, Syariah & Audit (REKSA), 5(1).
Minerva, L., Sumeisey, V. S., Stefani, S., Wijaya, S., & Lim, C. A. (2020). Pengaruh kualitas audit, debt ratio, ukuran perusahaan dan audit lag terhadap opini audit going concern. Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(1), 254-266.
Purnamasari, F. F., Oktavia, R., & Tubarad, C. P. T. (2020). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Opini Going concern. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 25(2), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.23960/jak.v25i2.131
Dewi, Se., Ak., M.Ak., Ca, H. P., & Mardiyah, R. (2021). Pengaruh Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya, Ukuran Perusahaan, Likuiditas, Profitabilitas, Dan Solvabilitas Terhadap Opini Going Concern (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014–2018). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis Krisnadwipayana, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.35137/jabk.v8i2.537
.png)
.png)
