Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan, Rasionalisasi dan Kemampuan Terhadap Tindakan Kecurangan (Fraud)
Abstract
This study was conducted at Class II A Correctional Institution and Class II B Detention Center in Padang City by involving prisoners of corruption as research subjects. The purpose of this study is to examine the variables that affect fraud according to pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and ability. The research method used is causative research with total sampling on 50 prisoners. Information was gathered via a survey with a Likert scale and processed using multiple regression analysis with Adjusted R2. The findings indicated that opportunity, rationalization, and lying ability have a significant influence on fraud, while pressure has no significant effect. Suggestions include expanding the scope of external auditor examinations, developing research variables, and using more varied data collection methods for future research. It is expected that this research will give different linked parties a better knowledge of the factors that drive fraud.
References
Antoni, R., Diah P.A, E., & Mansur, F. (2022). Faktor Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Terjadinya Kecendrungan Kecurangan (Fraud) Di Sektor Pemerintahan (Studi Empiris Pada Dinas-Dinas Di Provinsi Jambi). Jambi Accounting Review (JAR), 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22437/jar.v2i1.17247
Awaliah, K. N. (2023). Fraud Triangle Theory: Pendekatan Strategis Dalam Mendeteksi Korupsi Dan Kecurangan Pada Laporan Keuangan Publik. Karimah Tauhid, 2(5), 1493–1506.
Dahlia, A. A. P., & Marissa, P. (2013). Analisis pengaruh faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap tindak pidana korupsi. Proceedings of Population and Human Resources Development, 2.
Dorminey, J., Scott Fleming, A., Kranacher, M. J., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50131
Homer, E. M. (2020). Testing the fraud triangle: a systematic review. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2018-0136
Kagias, P., Cheliatsidou, A., Garefalakis, A., Azibi, J., & Sariannidis, N. (2022). The fraud triangle – an alternative approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 908–924. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-07-2021-0159
Novitasari, A. R., & Chariri, A. (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement Fraud Dalam Perspektif Fraud Pentagon. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 7(4), 1–15. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting
Omukaga, K. O. (2021). Is the fraud diamond perspective valid in Kenya?
Purwanto, E., Mulyadi, J., & Anwar, C. (2017). Kajian Konsep Diamond Fraud Theory Dalam Menunjang Efektivitas Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Di Pemerintah Kota Bogor. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 17(3), 149. https://doi.org/10.25124/jmi.v17i3.1153
Rae, K., & Subramaniam, N. (2008). Quality of internal control procedures: Antecedents and moderating effect on organisational justice and employee fraud. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(2), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810839820
Rustiarini, N. W., T, S., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Why people commit public procurement fraud? The fraud diamond view. In Journal of Public Procurement (Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 345–362). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-02-2019-0012
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The FWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. (2004) ‘The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant’, The CPA Journal, 74(12), pp. 38–42. doi: DOI:raud Diamond : Considering the Four ElemWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
Zahara, A., Kunci, K., & Kecurangan, T. (2017). Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan Dan Rasionalisasi Terhadap Tindakan Kecurangan (Fraud) (Survei pada Narapidana Tipikor di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Kota Pekanbaru).
.png)
.png)
