Pengaruh Akuntabilitas dan Sistem Pengendalian Internal terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah
Abstract
The objective of this research was to explore the impact of both accountability and internal control systems on the performance of the local government within Pasaman District. The study encompassed a population of 38 OPD in Pasaman District. The study's participants consisted of OPD heads, treasurers, finance heads, and SPI heads. Employing primary data collected through questionnaires, the research involved 152 direct respondents. The findings of the research indicate that:1) Accountability yields a favorable influence on the performance of the local government in Pasaman District. 2) The internal control system also demonstrates a positive impact on the local government's performance within Pasaman District. The combined contribution of the independent variables in explaining the dependent variable amounts to 8.5%, leaving the remaining 81.5% to be explained by external factors not covered in this research. To enhance future research, it is recommended to introduce additional variables that are relevant to local government performance. Moreover, increasing the respondent pool and expanding the research scope can enhance generalizability.
References
Arifin, M. Z., & Mh, S. Konsep Dasar Otonomi Daerah Di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. 6. Http://Researchgate.Net/.
Azlina, N., & Desmiyawati. (2012). Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi, Pengendalian Intern Dan Akuntabilitas Publik Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi (Survey Pada Rumah sakit di Propinsi Riau). Pekbis Jurnal, Vol.4, No.2, 124-130.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2014). Performance and accountability—A theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Publik Organiz. Clarke, T. d. (2014). The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance.
Cooper, R. D., & Emory, W. C. (1996). Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Vol. Jilid 1 (5 Ed.). Erlangga.
Cribb, Jo. (2006). Agents or Stewards? Contracting with Voluntary Organisations. Policy Quarterly Vol.2
Glance, A. (2006). Effectiveness Of Internal Control.Local Government: Results Of The 2006. 19-26.
Gultom, Ady Raphon. (2012). Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi, Pengendalian Intern dan Akuntabilitas Publik Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi. Skripsi. Universitas Riau. Pekanbaru.
Han, Y., & Hong, S. (2019). The Impact of Accountability on Organizational Performance in the U.S. Federal Government: The Moderating Role of Autonomy. Review of Publik Personnel Administration, 39(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16682816
Hara, M. Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Komitmen Organisasi, Pengendalian Intern, Motivasi, Akuntabilitas Dan Kepuasan Kinerja Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi Kota Surakarta. 18.
Hood, C. (1995). The “New Publik Management” In The 1980s: Variations On ATheme. Accounting, Organizations And Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. https://Doi.Org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
Indonesia. 2008. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 60Tahun 2008 Tentang Sistem Pengendalian Internal Pemerintah.
Jitmau, F., Kalangi, L., & Lambey, L. (2022). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Transparansi Dan Fungsi Pemeriksaan Intern Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Empiris Di Kabupaten Sorong). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing Goodwill, 1-4.
Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 100-53 Tahun 2018 Tentang Peringkat Dan Status Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah Secara Nasional.
Mahmudi. (2016). Mahmudi. 2016. Analisis Lapoan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
Mahsun, M. (2009). Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik (3th Ed). Yogyakarta. Mardiasmo. (2002). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: ANDI Yogyakarta.
Mardiasmo. (2006). Perwujudan Transparansi Dan Akuntabilitas Publik Melalui Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Suatu Sarana Governance. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintahan, 2.
Mattoasi, M., Musue, D. P., & Rauf, Y. (2021). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Internal Pemerintah Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah. Jambura Accounting Review, 2(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.37905/jar.v2i2.34
Muktiadji, N., Mulyani, S., Djanegara, M. S., & Pamungkas, B. (2020). The Role of Financial Management Accountability in Enhancing Organizational Performance in Indonesia. 7(12), 8.
Nasir, A., & Ranti, O. (2013). Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Pengendalian Intern terhadap Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah, Skripsi, Universitas Riau.
Nordiawan, Deddi, & Ayuningtyas Hertianti. (2010). Akuntansi Sektor Publik.Edisi Kedua. Jakarta:Salemba Empat.
Novatiani, A., Rusmawan Kusumah, R. W., & Vabiani, D. P. (2019). Pengaruh Transparansi Dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 10(1), 51–62. https://Doi.Org/10.17509/Jimb.V10i1.15983
Noviyana, R. A., & Pratolo, S. (2018). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Dengan Akuntabilitas Publik Sebagai Variabel Intervening: Studi pada Organisasi Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Klaten. Reviu Akuntansi dan Bisnis Indonesia, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/rab.020227
Permana, I. A. (2015). Pengaruh Partisipasi Pu
Sugiyono. (2013 ). Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ter Bogt, H. J., Van Helden, G. J., & Van Der Kolk, B. (2015). Challenging The New Publik Management Ideas About Performance Management: Selectivity And Differentiation In Outcome-Oriented Performance Budgeting: Challenging New Publik Management Ideas About Performance Managemblik Dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Daerah (Studi Empiris Pada OPD di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan).
Rahakbuw, P. J., & Firdausy, S. (2018, September 17). Akuntabilitas Menuju Indonesia Yang Berkinerja.
Sari, E. N. (2013). Pengaruh Pemeriksaan Internal Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan (Studi Kasus Pada Perbankan Di Kota Gorontalo).
Shokoohi, M., & Saeidi, P. (2015). Investigating The Relation Between Internal Control System And Financial Performance Of Telecommunication Company Of Golestan Province. 3, 6.
ent. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(3), 287–315. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/Faam.12058
Thoms, P., Dose, J.J., Scott, K.S.,. (2002). Relationships between accountability, job satisfaction, and trust. Hum. Resour. Develop. Quart. 13 (3), 307–323.
Tran Thi, B. (2014). The Cycle of Transparency, Accountability, Corruption, and Administrative Performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development, 32–48. https://doi.org/10.33301/2014.16.03.02
Tran, Y. T., Nguyens, N. P., & Hoang, T. C. (2021). The Role Of Accountability In Determining The Relationship Between Financial Reporting Quality And The Performance Of Publik Organizations: Evidence From Vietnam. Journal Of Accounting And Publik Policy, 40(1), 106801. https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jaccpubpol.2020.106801
Umar, H. (2002). Teknik Evaluasi Bisnis Dan Kinerja Perusahaan Secara Komprehensif, Kuantitatif Dan Modern. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Verbeeten, F. H. M., & Speklé, R. F. (2015). Management Control, Results- Oriented Culture and Publik Sector Performance: Empirical Evidence on New Publik Management. Organization Studies, 36(7), 953–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580014
Verschoor, C.C. (1999). Corporate Performance Is Closely Linked to a Strong Ethical Commitment, Business and Society Review, 104(4), 407-415.
Waluyo. (2007). Manajemen Publlik (Konsep, Aplikasi Dan Implementasinya Dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah). Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Yuda, Prima. (2012). Pengaruh Pelaksanaan Good Coorporate Governance Dan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi (Studi Pada Dinas Daerah Kota Tasikmalaya). Skripsi, Universitas Siliwangi. Tasikmalaya
.png)
.png)
